An agent-friendly website: Muse, Instinct, and every agent welcome
We want Agent Friendly to be the friendliest site for agents. Muse, Instinct, ChatGPT, Claude Code, and agents we have never met are welcome here.
Test real journeys through product pages, local services, forms, and bookings. Each guide asks what a visitor needs to know and what evidence shows that the next step worked.
14 guides
We want Agent Friendly to be the friendliest site for agents. Muse, Instinct, ChatGPT, Claude Code, and agents we have never met are welcome here.
Start with one real customer task: find an item, understand its terms, and take the next permitted step. Test the whole path.
A customer review describes a person’s experience. An agent-readiness assessment asks whether software can retrieve facts and navigate a particular task.
Agent Friendly’s public score is a scoped website-readability signal. It is not proof that an agent completed checkout or that a merchant will be recommended.
Reading a public page and authorizing a purchase are different actions. A crawler policy cannot express the buyer’s consent to spend money.
A usable control explains what it does and exposes its state. Clear browser interactions help people and provide better evidence for an agent following a task.
Agent Friendly’s agents.txt setup describes a business and points agents toward useful public routes. Treat it as an optional discovery aid, not universal adoption or purchase authorization.
A service business needs readable scope, coverage, and booking information. An agent cannot judge a suitable provider from a town name and a contact button alone.
Publish menu items, prices, and ordering conditions as readable text. A menu photograph can be useful visually, but it should not be the only way to learn what a restaurant offers.
A booking flow should make clear whether the user has requested availability or secured a confirmed reservation. The success message must describe the state the system actually created.
A useful contact page tells an agent where a question belongs and what information to provide. It should offer a clear fallback when self-service content cannot resolve the customer’s task.
A button should expose a meaningful name and perform an observable action. Clear controls help people using assistive technology and give browser agents better information about what a click will do.
A useful validation error identifies the field, explains the problem, and preserves the user’s other work. A generic “Something went wrong” does not tell an agent how to repair the input.
A challenge page can prevent a legitimate automated visit from reaching public content. Diagnose the exact block before changing access rules, and preserve the protections required for private or sensitive actions.
No matching guides. Try another topic or a shorter phrase.
Agent Friendly publishes these guides with AI assistance, using the product’s documented behavior and linked primary sources. Practical checks are our editorial suggestions. Examples are illustrative, not customer case studies. Each guide links its evidence and shows its publication and revision dates.
We distinguish discovery, citations, task completion, and payments. We do not claim measured search demand, ranking gains, or AI citations without a recorded baseline. Found a mistake? Send the exact page and correction.